In “The World Is Too Much with Us,” William
Wordsworth describes “us” as people whose culture has caused us to be out of
touch with nature. Wordsworth sees a community of people blinded by “getting
and spending,” and neglectful of our surroundings. Wordsworth develops dissonance
between people and nature through diction. Describing the Sea as “her” makes
nature seem tame and elegant. Likewise, the howling wind that is gathered up
like “sleeping flowers” appears to be peaceful and gentle. In contrast, Wordsworth
describes us as people who “lay waste our powers,” and give “our hearts away.” Wordsworth’s
choice of “waste” and “give” emphasizes our culture’s materialism that leads us
to be “out of tune” with nature. By the end of the poem, the speaker blatantly
states that he/she would “rather be/ A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn,” so
that he/she might see more of nature and less of society that makes the speaker
sad. The speaker of the poem seems to identify as one in tune with nature.
The speaker of Dylan Thomas’ poem “Fern Hill” is
also very much in tune with nature. It’s interesting to read these two poems
side by side because the first (Wordsworth’s poem) strongly criticizes society’s
materialism while the second (Thomas’ poem) portrays a life in unison with the
environment. The second poem is refreshing and carefree; it captures the
color in life. The speaker in “Fern Hill” is not at all concerned with
materialistic things, but rather it seems the speaker is very concerned with
time. The poem begins with “I was young and easy,” and we see repetition of
this line in the last stanza as the speaker reflects on childhood. The speaker
also describes a “sun that is young once only,” a “moon that is always rising,”
and time that held him/her “green and dying.” The incessant movement of life
with nature highlights what we should truly be concerned with: our time.
Interesting comparison and contrast.
ReplyDelete