Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Judgement: Pilates and Jesus
Everyone views judgment as morally unacceptable even though judgment is unavoidable. Now, not to sound like a crummy person but, we have all judged and been judged. This is obvious through the fact that no one is friends with everyone. There are without a doubt people you have judged because they act differently than you or have different morals. For the same reasons people have judged you. In our society, it is wrong to judge someone. While no one would say, "I do not want to talk to them because they look weird," it happens everyday you walk through HCHS hallways. There is no way to prevent judgment of others, the only option is to lessen judgment for the wrong reasons (race, sex, etc.) Judging due to race and sex is terrible and avoidable. Nonetheless, no one could ever try and stop someone from judging another for their actions (this happens in HCHS hallways, interviews and public places.)
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
W.H. Auden
(To JS/07 M 378
This Marble Monument
Is Erected by the State)
He was found by the Bureau of Statistics to be One against whom there was no official complaint, And all the reports on his conduct agree That, in the modern sense of an old-fashioned word, he was a saint, For in everything he did he served the Greater Community. Except for the War till the day he retired He worked in a factory and never got fired, But satisfied his employers, Fudge Motors Inc. Yet he wasn’t a scab or odd in his views, For his Union reports that he paid his dues, (Our report on his Union shows it was sound) And our Social Psychology workers found That he was popular with his mates and liked a drink. The Press are convinced that he bought a paper every day And that his reactions to advertisements were normal in every way. Policies taken out in his name prove that he was fully insured, And his Health-card shows he was once in hospital but left it cured. Both Producers Research and High-Grade Living declare He was fully sensible to the advantages of the Instalment Plan And had everything necessary to the Modern Man, A phonograph, a radio, a car and a frigidaire. Our researchers into Public Opinion are content That he held the proper opinions for the time of year; When there was peace, he was for peace: when there was war, he went. He was married and added five children to the population, Which our Eugenist says was the right number for a parent of his generation. And our teachers report that he never interfered with their education. Was he free? Was he happy? The question is absurd: Had anything been wrong, we should certainly have heard.This particular poem deviates from the standard expectations of modernist poetry as it is entirely a satirical commentary on the true uniqueness of man. The poem starts out with a message saying that the following is for a marble monument for the citizen, beginning the satire. Throughout the poem, the speaker basically describes the things that the citizen had done in his life that was good, like serve in the army, not get fired, quietly live his life. However, because the man had lived a very quiet and cautious life, he was considered free because it was in his will. This is quite contrary to the speaker's beliefs, who believes that non-unique behavior does not equal freedom. The satirical nature of the poem is summed up with the two questions at the end of the poem; literally, the speaker is saying that "Of course! Of course he was free, he's just like everyone else so naturally we would know if he wasn't." The true meaning of what the speaker is trying to say is that what everyone else sees as freedom and happiness is simply just a highly conformist nature masked by the idea of a free country.
As I mentioned before, the poem doesn't very much align with modernist poetry. It is pretty independent in itself, but it does align slightly more with postmodern poetry due to the irony and satire present and the political issues it addresses. I also think it's interesting how Auden wrote this poem after he moved to America after the war, as this poem talks about a citizen's "free" life after the war.
I found the poem on this website:
http://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/unknown-citizen
Frank O'Hara
http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/171374
A Step Away from Them
BY FRANK O'HARA
Lawrence Ferlinghetti
Constantly Risking Absurdity (#15)
http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/lawrence-ferlinghetti
Sonia Sanchez
This poem, "poem at thirty, deviates from the style of writing of the time some. Bringing the tone and content to a more personal level, Sanchez reminisces about her life on the eve of her thirtieth birthday. At the beginning of the poem, she seems frustrated about all that she missed out on, looking back. The organization of the poem (the interrupted thoughts and the short sentences) help to reveal the frustration of the poet. She reflects on all that she has endured, and the tone becomes more prideful towards the end.
Though it does not exactly reflect the style of writing of the time, it does capture the struggles of an African American woman growing up, which fits thematically with poetry at the time.
Source: "No More Masks! An Anthology of Twentieth-Century American Women Poets" (1993), Florence Howe
Death is a casual countryman
Charles Olson was born in 1910 and died at the age of 60 in 1970. Olson would be categorized with the black mountain poets. This group of poets began with a school for the arts known as black mountain college. This institution was only open for 23 years and enrolled fewer than 1200 students. Charles Olson actually introduced an open field poetry form, in which each line could be read in one breath and phrase.
The most intriguing poem of Olson's to me was "Cole's island"
Link for your viewing pleasure here
If read correctly you can see how his poem lines up with the style characteristic of the group and time period after.
The meaning of this poem also makes me think. Olson is implying that this man walking near him as if he is just minding his own business, is death. So casually does death stroll past without giving any more acknowledgment to Olson's character than a mere head nod. In life this becomes apparent also. death seems to stroll among us as if he owns the "island" we populate. This is brilliant. Olson is a very creatively accurate poet from the black mountain college.
Perseus and Medusa
But this didn't stop Zeus. Obviously. It's Zeus. He came to Danae in the form of golden rain. I actually had to stop to laugh for a good 2 minutes straight when I read that. Nothing, not even a prison under the earth, is going to stop Zeus from mating with whomever he pleases. This interaction caused Danae to fall pregnant with Perseus. When Acrisius learned of this, he did not believe Zeus was the father, and he let his daughter and grandson out on the open sea on an ark. They ended up at Serifos Island where they were adopted by a man on the island. That man happened to be the brother of Polydectes, the king of the island.
Polydectes wanted to wife Danae, but he knew with Perseus there he wouldn't be able to make that happen. So he decided to send Perseus on a crazy mission where he asked for the head of the gorgon Medusa.
Now we come to Medusa. Medusa was one of three sisters, all gorgons. She was the only mortal one. Legend has it that all three used to be beautiful maidens. Medusa was so beautiful that Poseidon fell in love with her. She did not reciprocate, so Poseidon cursed her and her sisters to be gorgons: monsters who turned anyone who dared look them in the eye into stone. They also had snakes for hair. Just as an added touch.
So Perseus had a difficult task. Athena and Hermes provided assistance, supplying Perseus with winged sandals, a cap that made him invisible, a sword, and a mirrored shield. If you've seen Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief, this should sound familiar. Seeing the reflection of Medusa did not turn one into stone. Perseus successfully beheaded Medusa, and from her drops of blood rose Pegasus, the winged horse, and and Chrysaor, a giant or winged boar. And yeah, that was kind of it. Perseus did it. Yaaaaay.
My hair has an interesting history. I was born with dark brown hair. My mom says the first and only thing she was able to see of me when I was born before they took me away (I was premature) was my dark hair. All three of my sisters had relatively light hair compared to me. As everyone may well know, I am no stranger to hair dye. I began dyeing my hair in the fourth grade (I'm not kidding.) I started off with wash-out blonde hair dye that turned my hair a coppery color. I didn't redye it for a good year or so, so I had horrendous roots. My mom finally redyed my hair right before picture day in the fifth grade. It was dark brown, but in the picture it looks hilighted light brown. I remember I got a really bad perm in sixth grade so my hair was really frizzy. I didn't dye my hair again until the summer before freshman year though, when I dyed it red. Though it really turned out more auburny. I kept the reddish hair all year until my birthday when I wanted to go back to my natural color. I used some foam dye that dyed it really dark brown but it washed out immediately. So I had the reddish brown color until October of my sophomore year when I accidentally dyed it black. The box said it would be light brown, my hair turned black. I kept that hair until I bleached my tips, and every so often I would make my tips green. That wasn't the best hair color I've had. I chopped off my tips at the very end of sophomore year and redyed it deep red, and it stayed that way until the beginning of junior year when I dyed it dark brown. (Do you see a pattern here?) It stayed a good dark brown color until last summer when I decided I wanted to go back to red. This decision was entirely swayed by the book series I was reading at the time. The heroine was redheaded, I wanted to be redheaded. At some point in the beginning of senior year I decided I wanted to try to dye my hair blonde. That's what resulted in my "pumpkin spice," or my really orange hair. I kept that until the Catching Fire movie came out and I impulsively dyed my hair dark brown. It stayed that way for like a month or so until I went back to my "pumpkin spice" hair. I was then swayed to dye my hair red again, and I used my tried and true hair dye. It dyed my hair, no joke, Ariel from the Little Mermaid red. It did not look like real hair. I tried in vain to dilute it by taking like 20 showers in a row but nothing lessened the intense red. So I dyed my hair about 4 times afterwards to get to a normal brownish color. That was a crazy weekend. But yeah, a few weeks ago I decided I wanted to bleach my tips so I did. And that's the color history of my hair so far. It will probably change at least two times more before we graduate. I don't ever put thought into my hair. If I want to change the color, I pretty much immediately do it. Oh well. SORRY FOR THE LENGTHY POST ABOUT MY HAIR BUT I'VE DONE A LOT TO MY HAIR.
William Wordsworth
MY heart leaps up when I behold | |
A rainbow in the sky: | |
So was it when my life began, | |
So is it now I am a man, | |
So be it when I shall grow old | |
Or let me die! | |
The child is father of the man: | |
And I could wish my days to be | |
Bound each to each by natural piety. |
jesus is metal as frick
From what I've gathered - and mind you, I'm far from a Biblical scholar - the 'leaders', said to be the chief priests and scribes, were formulating a way to kill Jesus. There's also something about Jesus being anointed at Bethany, but from my frantic Googling to figure out exactly what this scene is (it's not as well-known as the parting of the Red Sea, it's a bit more nebulous than that) I've gathered that this part isn't what's most important. What's most important is that before what became the Last Supper, Judas made a deal with the priests to betray Jesus and he got paid for it. I would try to be funny with this, but for some reason, the humor's just not happening right now. Maybe it's because I'm not funny, maybe it's because I'm typing properly for the sake of maintaining some semblance of reverence for a sad Biblical story.
Whatever. At the Last Supper, Jesus basically tells his apostles 'one of you will betray me', and they all freak out, and he says that the one who will betray him will be one who 'dippeth with me in the dish'. Whatever that means. I think he's just again reiterating the fact that one of the people eating with him (ding ding ding, Judas included) will betray him. I just realized that I probably should have said earlier that Judas was one of Jesus' apostles, but I think you all know that already, so it just seems redundant. It was at the Last Supper that Jesus also told them 'eat this bread, it's my body, drink this wine, it's my blood'. Hannibal would be proud.
Then they go to Gethsemane and go into this garden, and Jesus basically tells them, 'the fact that I'm going to die makes me sad.' So he just lays down in the grass and OKAY I JUST LOOKED IT UP I THINK I KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW. Jesus prays three times to God, at first basically asking 'WHY DO I HAVE TO DIE. THIS SUCKS.' but eventually he's like 'okay, if you want this, it's chill.' And he sweats blood. Metal. But yeah, in between all this blood-sweating prayer he checks on his apostles, who have, like. Fallen asleep or something? And after the third time he's like 'GET UP GUYS I'M ABOUT TO BE BETRAYED.' So that's exciting.
And then Judas betrays Jesus and yeah yeah yeah. I'm not even sure if I got the right section of the Bible when doing this. Is this the Agony of Christ? I have no idea, but I do know that I wrote too much.
tl;dr Judas promises to betray Jesus for some cash, Jesus tells his apostles at the Last Supper that he will be betrayed by one of the people eating with him, he also starts communion, basically, and then after coming to terms with his fate and sweating blood like the metalhead he is, Jesus is like 'I'm gonna be betrayed now' and then Judas betrays him. Pretty agonizing. I think the 'agony' is just him wailing to God about why he has to die and how he doesn't want to, but then he deals with it. Go, Jesus.
An agonizing thing I've had to face at Henry Clay... too many things to count. I'm going to take the lame route out and not say much about this because I've already written plenty as is. Uh. That big chemistry lab sophomore year. AP Environmental Science. All those biology dissections. Mentoring crap. HOORAY FOR MISERY.
Amiri Baraka
In assessing the degree to which Baraka fit into the Black Arts movement, it's important to note that he evolved as a writer very significantly. Initially, he was a moderate civil rights advocate who became radicalized and extreme, until ultimately he abandoned the Black Power movement to instead be a Marxist (at which point he rejected racial differences). That said, the poem I selected clearly fits within his Black Power years, and is a strongly worded praise of Afrocentrism that, though it avoids the offensive language towards nonblacks/women/Jews/Arabs/Christians/LGBTQ+ people that many of Baraka's other poems contain, is nevertheless more on the Garvey side of the spectrum than the MLK side. "Our world is more lovely than anyone's," states Baraka, and "We are beautiful people." The message here is not one of equity but rather of blacks being superior to whites. This fits within the more radical strains of the Black Arts movement quite well, and though this poem is not aggressive, many of his others are. He does recognize the oppression confronting the black community: "we have been captured," and "we sprawl in gray chains," and so on, and he wants black people to "raise up/return, destroy, create."
The title of the poem, Ka'Ba, denotes Islam's holiest place, a shrine in Mecca. Amiri (prince) and Baraka (blessed) are his chosen names, drawn from Arabic, because Amiri was a black Muslim whose stances often paralleled those of the best known black Muslim group, the NOI. Baraka describes a crowded, hectic courtyard (he's from New York), with the beautiful sounds of black voices. He then ties those black voices to African culture, which he maintains, though fettered, remains vibrant. He next turns to exploring how blacks have been oppressed in America: chains (though once literal, now figurative), have kept black people from expressing and actualizing themselves. Now, he contends, is time for them to stand up, destroy their chains, and claim their righteous places. It's not exactly clear what this process entails: the word "destroy," for instance, is used--but is it the obstacles that are to be destroyed, or white culture? There is also an element of mysticism in that he claims that "spells" are needed, and that the "sacred word" must be found.
Gregory Corso
I am watching them churn the last milk they'll ever get from me.
They are waiting for me to die;
They want to make buttons out of my bones.
Where are my sisters and brothers?
That tall monk there, loading my uncle, he has a new cap.
And that idiot student of his -- I never saw that muffler before.
Poor uncle, he lets them load him.
How sad he is, how tired!
I wonder what they'll do with his bones?
And that beautiful tail!
How many shoelaces will they make of that!
http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/a_f/corso/onlinepoems.htm
Gregory Corso (1930-2001) was a member of the Beat Generation of literature. "The Beats" was a Post-world War II phenomenon that practiced anti-establishment, and visionary art. To most members of this generation, Buddhism was very important and they all had a great connection with nature. On the powerpoint it says that many of these poems follow the idea of "First thought, best thought!" and most of the poems referenced or were in response to political ideas of the time.
In Corso's poem, "The Mad Yak" there is definitely the connection to nature that is present in many works of the time. The poem talks about how people just use yaks and don't consider the effects it has on them. This commentary sheds light on the issues of mankind's cruelness through the juxtaposition of the monk's lack of care for anyone else, and the yak's compassion for his family.
There is a shift in the poem between lines 6 and 8, where the poem shifts from the yak's own issues to the issues of his family. The selflessness demonstrated here is supposed to contrast the selfishness shown by the human race and adds to the support of how cruel humans beings are.
I was curious as to whether or not there was certain significance of the yak....in some cultures the yak symbolizes ancient wisdom and an understanding of a higher purpose so that would make them more knowledgable than humans adding to the ideas. Also, they are considered loyal to their small group so that would also show the caring nature described in this poem.
And here is something interesting.....I googled "Buddhism and Yaks" to see if anything came up and turns out that in 2011 there was a documentary made, 108 Yaks: A Journey Of Love And Freedom, that is about 22 herders and porters that led 108 yaks through the mountains to some villagers who could take care of them. Animal liberation is common in Buddhism, thus relating back to the poem.
(http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/yaks-buddhism-and-the-soul/article3620678.ece)
If you are ever interested in learning some more stuff about yaks......here is a link to the documentary!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxBxS20qR5Q
Monday, April 28, 2014
"Child" by Sylvia Plath
Friday, April 25, 2014
e.e. cummings - anyone lived in a pretty how town
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Langston Hughes
Let America Be America Again
by Langston Hughes (Harlem Renaissance)
Let America be America again.
Let it be the dream it used to be.
Let it be the pioneer on the plain
Seeking a home where he himself is free.
(America never was America to me.)
Let America be the dream the dreamers dreamed—
Let it be that great strong land of love
Where never kings connive nor tyrants scheme
That any man be crushed by one above.
(It never was America to me.)
O, let my land be a land where Liberty
Is crowned with no false patriotic wreath,
But opportunity is real, and life is free,
Equality is in the air we breathe.
(There's never been equality for me,
Nor freedom in this "homeland of the free.")
Say, who are you that mumbles in the dark?
And who are you that draws your veil across the stars?
I am the poor white, fooled and pushed apart,
I am the Negro bearing slavery's scars.
I am the red man driven from the land,
I am the immigrant clutching the hope I seek—
And finding only the same old stupid plan
Of dog eat dog, of mighty crush the weak.
I am the young man, full of strength and hope,
Tangled in that ancient endless chain
Of profit, power, gain, of grab the land!
Of grab the gold! Of grab the ways of satisfying need!
Of work the men! Of take the pay!
Of owning everything for one's own greed!
I am the farmer, bondsman to the soil.
I am the worker sold to the machine.
I am the Negro, servant to you all.
I am the people, humble, hungry, mean—
Hungry yet today despite the dream.
Beaten yet today—O, Pioneers!
I am the man who never got ahead,
The poorest worker bartered through the years.
Yet I'm the one who dreamt our basic dream
In the Old World while still a serf of kings,
Who dreamt a dream so strong, so brave, so true,
That even yet its mighty daring sings
In every brick and stone, in every furrow turned
That's made America the land it has become.
O, I'm the man who sailed those early seas
In search of what I meant to be my home—
For I'm the one who left dark Ireland's shore,
And Poland's plain, and England's grassy lea,
And torn from Black Africa's strand I came
To build a "homeland of the free."
The free?
Who said the free? Not me?
Surely not me? The millions on relief today?
The millions shot down when we strike?
The millions who have nothing for our pay?
For all the dreams we've dreamed
And all the songs we've sung
And all the hopes we've held
And all the flags we've hung,
The millions who have nothing for our pay—
Except the dream that's almost dead today.
O, let America be America again—
The land that never has been yet—
And yet must be—the land where every man is free.
The land that's mine—the poor man's, Indian's, Negro's, ME—
Who made America,
Whose sweat and blood, whose faith and pain,
Whose hand at the foundry, whose plow in the rain,
Must bring back our mighty dream again.
Sure, call me any ugly name you choose—
The steel of freedom does not stain.
From those who live like leeches on the people's lives,
We must take back our land again,
America!
O, yes,
I say it plain,
America never was America to me,
And yet I swear this oath—
America will be!
Out of the rack and ruin of our gangster death,
The rape and rot of graft, and stealth, and lies,
We, the people, must redeem
The land, the mines, the plants, the rivers.
The mountains and the endless plain—
All, all the stretch of these great green states—
And make America again!
Marianne Moore
The formatting is a little weird- check out the link below for better formatting of the poem:
http://poetryx.com/poetry/poems/8793/
To a Snail
If “compression is the first grace of style”,
you have it. Contractility is a virtue
as modesty is a virtue.
It is not the acquisition of any one thing
that is able to adorn,
or the incidental quality that occurs
as a concomitant of something well said,
that we value in style,
but the principle that is hid:
in the absence of feet, “a method of conclusions”;
“a knowledge of principles”,
in the curious phenomenon of your occipital horn.
After first looking at this poem I was thinking, boy this is strange. Since I new to look for ties to modernism I first noticed the title. "To a Snail" is very interesting, my first thoughts jumped to the idea that it must be about nature- that's a tie to modernism! Alas, I quickly realized this poem is talking about the fundamentals but not the fundamentals of nature, but rather the core of writing. Specifically, the beauty and technique of writing conclusions. I will be honest this is not what first came to mind, but after reading more about Moore and this poem this theme did not seem so strange. The line starting with "as a concomitant..." is talking about how a good ending almost always accompanies a well said idea. She follows by saying that in the feet or end of the poem or writing hides the "'knowledge of principles." If talking about the fundamentals of writing and nature is not enough I read that many modernist liked to experiment with the form and structure of poetry. Though I think this analysis may be a stretch I read that some believe that the enjambment that makes the poem have a long line followed by a short line, repeated over and over, represents the motion of a snail contacting and expanding. Overall, Moore was one cool lady who clearly fit the modernist style of writing. To a Snail is only one example of many.
A Brown Girl Dead by Countee Cullen (For Extra Credit)
A Brown Girl Dead
By Countee Cullen
Paul Laurence Dunbar
When the sun is bright on the upland slopes;
When the wind stirs soft through the springing grass,
And the river flows like a stream of glass;
When the first bird sings and the first bud opes,
And the faint perfume from its chalice steals--
I know what the caged bird feels!
I know why the caged bird beats his wing
Till its blood is red on the cruel bars;
For he must fly back to his perch and cling
When he fain would be on the bough a-swing;
And a pain still throbs in the old, old scars
And they pulse again with a keener sting--
I know why he beats his wing!
I know why the caged bird sings, ah me,
When his wing is bruised and his bosom sore,--
When he beats his bars and he would be free;
It is not a carol of joy or glee,
But a prayer that he sends from his heart's deep core,
But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings--
I know why the caged bird sings!
Andrew Marvell
To His Coy Mistress
Marvell's period: 17th century
Movement: Metaphysical poetry
Summary of the movement with the word doc:
A metaphysical poem is generally one that meditates on love and death, sometimes touching on religion and human frailty. These poems tend to be realistic and are famous for their difficulty and obscurity. When deciding if a poem is from the metaphysical movement, look for wit, irony, and paradox; wit usually pairs dissimilar objects together in a clever manner. Stylistic choices seem easy and smooth. There can be huge shifts in scale. The poet usually talks about some deep philosophical stuff in the poems.
About this poem:
This poem definitely fits the metaphysical style. The rhymes flow off the tongue and really fuel and show the speaker's thirst for this lady. It comments on the shortness of human life and how death is so easily come by. The speaker starts off talking about how if he could have all the time in the world with his lover, he would use every second, not rushing a thing. But alas, he only has time enough to spew out this poem to convince her that they need to make love right now. While they're young. Someone needs to get this man some water.
So there's some clever comparisons in the talk about time and death, and some talk about love. It could be difficult to understand if you don't catch the shift, or if you don't get that the talk of time is hypothetical. Carpe diem for some philosophical stuff and deeper meaning, anyone?
Oscar Wilde
By: Oscar Wilde
Changed to a Harmony in grey:
A barge with ochre-coloured hay
Dropt from the wharf: and chill and cold
The bridges, till the houses' walls
Seemed changed to shadows and St. Paul's
Loomed like a bubble o'er the town.
Of waking life; the streets were stirred
With country waggons: and a bird
Flew to the glistening roofs and sang.
The daylight kissing her wan hair,
Loitered beneath the gas lamps' flare,
With lips of flame and heart of stone.